Skip to content
🎉 Your SNAP 🥳
I expected something better

Alejandro Fernadez has a nice powerfull voice. I love his mariachi albums. His ealier pop cds were not too bad, but this one is very disappointing. He does not sing to his potential, the material selected is boring, the duet with that female pop singer is horrible. It looks that Alejandro tries too hard to conquer the crowd of teenagers.

Not Alejandro's style

Love the hit song "Te voy a perder" and the song with Beyonce', but the rest of the songs are okay. Kinda boring. They are not Alejandro's style of music. I love Alejandro soooooo much I dream of him. I listen to his concert in Spain CD three to four times a week and watch his DVD very often. He's my idol. I love his other cd's also "Corazon Abierto" and his Mariachi CD's. He's awesome! This new cd of his, just isn't his style. I believe he's trying to get into the pop scene, but he's better with his balads and Mariachi music. If you want to listen to it, I suggest buying a used one instead and save your money.Ale, you can come to my home anytime for dinner and ??!Ale's big FAN!

Very good.

Alejandro has a very pleasant voice that projects real feelings in the words he is expressing. Whether he sings pop or rancheras his voice captures the listener.

★★
don't bother

What a mistake this one was... His Ranchero stuff is absolutely wonderful. This is junk. Sorry.Look elsewhere and listen carefully before you buy.

Maureen McGovern's "The Music Never Ends"

Maureen McGovern's new release "The Music Never Ends" was recommended to me by a friend. It was a wonderful recommendation.The songs are beautiful and the arrangements are amazing. Maureen McGovern's voice is liquid and it is no wonder that one of the arrangements, "The Summer Knows," was nominated for a grammy. The arrangement for "The Windmills of Your Mind" is incredible as well.I found it to be the perfect accompaniment for a quiet dinner or a nice glass of wine.

★★
Quack in Action

Gale's book is split into two parts. The first half is a selective and biased history of the Industrial Revolution. The second half of the book is an incomplete analysis of global warming. She often overstates her case, and always leaps to the worst conclusions possible. She never informs the reader of the problems with the global warming analysis, such as satelites that were configured incorrectly. She never deals with the fact that our current instruments are more accurate, and that past figures are suspect. And she all but ignores nature's impact on what she is studying.If you're into Global Warming, you'll love this book.If believe Global Warming is a farse, you'll be annoyed by the book.If you're undecided, don't bother with this hysterical, biased, and poorly argued book. It includes nothing new to the debate, and often leaves the reader believing he knows facts, when they are only congecture.

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded